14th Amendment Purpose
Summary History Results Constitution, 14th Amendment Ratification Dates, Date 14th Amendment Ratified, Dates States Ratified
Year 14th Amendment Ratified Years Signed Bill of Rights
14th Amendment* to the U.S. Constitution
The 14th Amendment guarantees the rights of citizens
and other persons.
The 14th Amendment to the Constitution was ratified on July 9, 1868,
and granted citizenship to “all persons born or naturalized in the United States,” which included former slaves recently freed. In addition, it forbids states from denying any person "life, liberty or property, without due process
of law" or to "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of its laws.” By directly mentioning
the role of the states, the 14th Amendment greatly expanded the protection of civil rights to all Americans and is cited in
more litigation than any other amendment. (See Proposal and Ratification of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution)
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and
subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall
make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State
deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction
the equal protection of the laws.
Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States
according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But
when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives
in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of
the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged,
except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion
which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.
Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or
elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State,
who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any
State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States,
shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress
may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized
by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion,
shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in
aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all
such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation,
the provisions of this article.
*No guaranteed rights
for the original inhabitants and residents of present-day United States:
While African Americans
received citizenship with the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, American Indians, or Native Americans, on the other
hand, were denied citizenship for more than another half-century. "Life, liberty, or property" was not guaranteed or
applicable to the initial inhabitants of the land, and, without citizenship, Native
Americans were herded onto reservations or hunted like wild animals. On June 2, 1924, however, with passage of the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924, America's indigenous peoples became United States citizens.
Sources: Library of Congress (Primary Documents in American History); U.S. Constitution Online; National
Archives United States Constitution
Recommended Reading: Democracy Reborn: The Fourteenth Amendment and the Fight for Equal Rights in Post-Civil
Publishers Weekly: In December 1865, the 39th Congress had urgent business, says Epps in this passionate
account of Reconstruction politics. If the former Confederate states were readmitted to the Union, ex-slaves would swell those states' congressional power, but without congressional
protection, the freedmen would never be allowed to vote, and the Southern white elite would have disproportionate influence
in the federal government. Epps follows every twist of Congress's response to this problem, and his energetic prose transforms
potentially tedious congressional debates into riveting reading. Continued below…
He illuminates the fine points, such as the distinction in the 19th century between civil
rights—relating to property and employment, which many thought blacks should have—and political rights, which
some thought only educated men of wealth should have. Congressmen were not the only people energized by the conundrums of
electoral representation. Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton petitioned for women's suffrage on the same grounds
as blacks. While Congress hammered out the 14th and 15th Amendments, white Southerners were putting in place the Jim Crow
codes that would subvert those amendments until the 1960s. As constitutional scholar and novelist Epps (The Shad Treatment)
notes in a rousing afterword, there are many corners in which they are not fully realized today.
Recommended Reading: The U.S. Constitution: And Fascinating Facts About It. Description: In The U.S. Constitution & Fascinating Facts About It you'll
see the entire text of the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence--and much more! You'll find
interesting insights into the men who wrote the Constitution, how it was created, and how the Supreme Court has interpreted
the Constitution in the two centuries since its creation.
Recommended Reading: Lincoln
and Douglas: The Debates that Defined America
(Simon & Schuster) (February 5, 2008) (Hardcover). Description: In 1858, Abraham Lincoln was known as a successful Illinois
lawyer who had achieved some prominence in state politics as a leader in the new Republican Party. Two years later, he was
elected president and was on his way to becoming the greatest chief executive in American history. What carried this one-term
congressman from obscurity to fame was the campaign he mounted for the United States Senate against the country's most formidable
politician, Stephen A. Douglas, in the summer and fall of 1858. Lincoln challenged Douglas
directly in one of his greatest speeches -- "A house divided against itself cannot stand" -- and confronted Douglas on the
questions of slavery and the inviolability of the Union in seven fierce debates. As this
brilliant narrative by the prize-winning Lincoln scholar Allen Guelzo dramatizes, Lincoln would emerge a predominant national figure, the leader of his
party, the man who would bear the burden of the national confrontation. Continued below...
the great issue between Lincoln and Douglas was slavery. Douglas was the champion of "popular sovereignty," of letting states and territories decide
for themselves whether to legalize slavery. Lincoln drew a
moral line, arguing that slavery was a violation both of natural law and of the principles expressed in the Declaration of
Independence. No majority could ever make slavery right, he argued. Lincoln lost that Senate
race to Douglas, though he came close to toppling the "Little Giant," whom almost everyone
thought was unbeatable. Guelzo's Lincoln and Douglas brings alive their debates and this whole year of campaigns and underscores
their centrality in the greatest conflict in American history. The encounters between Lincoln and Douglas engage a key question
in American political life: What is democracy's purpose? Is it to satisfy the desires of the majority? Or is it to achieve
a just and moral public order? These were the real questions in 1858 that led to the Civil War. They remain questions for
Recommended Reading: No State Shall Abridge: The Fourteenth
Amendment and the Bill of Rights. Review: Curtis effectively settles a serious legal debate:
whether the framers of the 14th Amendment intended to incorporate the Bill of Rights guarantees and thereby inhibit state
action. Taking on a formidable array of constitutional scholars, with the Attorney General in the wings, he rebuts their argument
with vigor and effectiveness, conclusively demonstrating the legitimacy of the incorporation thesis. Continued below...
He does so by placing the Amendment in the stew of history: by examining first the historical context, and
then Republican ideology as reflected in legislative debate over the 13th and 14th amendments as well as over the 1866 Civil
Rights Act. Taking the legal story down to the present, Curtis traces the Court's gradual acceptance of incorporation, until
Cardozo in Palko and then until the Burger Court. A bold, forcefully argued, important study.
Recommended Reading: We the People: The Fourteenth Amendment and the Supreme Court. Description: Several of the most divisive moral conflicts that have
beset Americans in the period since World War II have been transmuted into constitutional conflicts and resolved as such.
In his new book, eminent legal scholar Michael Perry evaluates the grave charge that the modern Supreme Court has engineered
a "judicial usurpation of politics." In particular, Perry inquires which of several major Fourteenth Amendment conflicts--over
race segregation, race-based affirmative action, sex-based discrimination, homosexuality, abortion, and physician-assisted
suicide--have been resolved as they should have been. He lays the necessary groundwork for his inquiry by addressing questions
of both constitutional theory and constitutional history. A clear-eyed examination of some of the perennial controversies
in American life, We the People is a major contribution to modern constitutional studies.
Recommended Reading: The Constitution of the United States of America, with the Bill of Rights and
all of the Amendments; The Declaration of Independence; and the Articles of Confederation, by Thomas Jefferson (Author),
Second Continental Congress (Author), Constitutional Convention (Author). Description:
Collected in one affordable volume are the most important documents of the United States of America: The Constitution of the United States of America, with the Bill of Rights and all
of the Amendments; The Declaration of Independence; and the Articles of Confederation. These three documents are the basis
for our entire way of life. Every citizen should have a copy.
Recommended Reading: Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era
(Oxford History of the United States)
(Hardcover: 952 pages). Description: Published in 1988
to universal acclaim, this single-volume treatment of the Civil War quickly became recognized as the new standard in its field.
James M. McPherson, who won the Pulitzer Prize for this book, impressively
combines a brisk writing style with an admirable thoroughness. James McPherson's fast-paced narrative fully integrates the
political, social, and military events that crowded the two decades from the outbreak of one war in Mexico
to the ending of another at Appomattox. Packed with drama
and analytical insight, the book vividly recounts the momentous episodes that preceded the Civil War including the Dred Scott
decision, the Lincoln-Douglas debates, and John Brown's raid on Harper's Ferry. It flows into a masterful chronicle of the
war itself--the battles, the strategic maneuvering by each side, the politics, and the personalities. Continued below...
notable are McPherson's new views on such matters as Manifest Destiny, Popular Sovereignty, Sectionalism, and slavery
expansion issues in the 1850s, the origins of the Republican Party, the causes of secession, internal dissent and anti-war
opposition in the North and the South, and the reasons for the Union's victory. The
book's title refers to the sentiments that informed both the Northern and Southern views of the conflict. The South seceded
in the name of that freedom of self-determination and self-government for which their fathers had fought in 1776, while the
North stood fast in defense of the Union founded by those fathers as the bulwark of American
liberty. Eventually, the North had to grapple with the underlying cause of the war, slavery, and adopt a policy of emancipation
as a second war aim. This "new birth of freedom," as Lincoln called it, constitutes the proudest
legacy of America's bloodiest conflict.
This authoritative volume makes sense of that vast and confusing "second American Revolution" we call the Civil War, a war
that transformed a nation and expanded our heritage of liberty. . Perhaps more than any other book, this one belongs on the bookshelf of every Civil War buff.