President Andrew Johnson Impeachment History
1a. To make an accusation against
1b. To charge with misconduct in office before a proper tribunal
To challenge or discredit
IMPEACHMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION
"The House of Representatives shall...have the sole power of Impeachment." Article I, Section 2
"The Senate shall have the power to try all Impeachments...When the President of the United States is tried,
the Chief Justice shall preside. And no person shall be convicted without the concurrence of two thirds of the members
present." Article I, Section 3
"The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on
Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors." Article II, Section
IMPEACHMENT DOES NOT MEAN REMOVAL FROM OFFICE
The House of Representatives decides if there is sufficient evidence to warrant a Senate trial. The House
votes impeachment - the Senate tries the case. Similar to an indictment in a criminal case, impeachment is an accusation of
wrongdoing. Any civil officer of the United States may be impeached. Removal from office occurs only after a conviction by
PRESIDENT ANDREW JOHNSON IMPEACHMENT
|President Andrew Johnson Impeachment History
|President Andrew Johnson
The Impeachment of Andrew
Johnson, 17th President of the United States, was one of the most dramatic events in the political life of the United States
during Reconstruction, and the first impeachment in history of a sitting United States president. The Impeachment was the
consummation of a lengthy political battle, between the moderate Johnson and the "Radical Republican" movement that dominated
Congress and sought control of Reconstruction policies.
Johnson was impeached on
February 24, 1868 in the U.S. House of Representatives on eleven articles of impeachment detailing his "high crimes and misdemeanors",
in accordance with Article Two of the United States Constitution. The House's primary charge against Johnson was with violation
of the Tenure of Office Act, passed by Congress the previous year. Specifically, he had removed Edwin M. Stanton, the Secretary
of War (whom the Tenure of Office Act was largely designed to protect), from office and replaced him with Major General Lorenzo
The House agreed to the articles
of impeachment on March 2, 1868. The trial began three days later in the Senate, with Supreme Court Chief Justice Salmon P.
Chase presiding. Trial concluded on May 26 with Johnson's acquittal, the votes for conviction being one less than the required
Senator David Trotter Patterson,
son-in-law to President Johnson, believed that his father-in-law was "not guilty and that the charges against him were contrived."
Patterson's vote was the difference between guilty and acquittal.
The impeachment and subsequent
trial gained a historical reputation as an act of political expedience, rather than necessity, based on Johnson's defiance
of an unconstitutional piece of legislation and with little regard for the will of the public (which, despite the unpopularity
of Johnson, opposed the impeachment). Until the impeachment of Bill Clinton 131 years later, it was the only presidential
impeachment in the history of the United States. See also President Andrew Johnson: History Homepage.
Articles of Impeachment
February 24, three days after Johnson's dismissal of Stanton, the House of Representatives voted 126 to 47 in favor of a resolution
to impeach the President of high crimes and misdemeanors. The two sponsors of the resolution, Thaddeus Stevens and John A.
Bingham were immediately dispatched to inform the Senate that the House had officially voted for impeachment.
week later, the House adopted eleven articles of impeachment against the president. The articles charged Johnson with:
Edwin Stanton from office after the Senate had voted not to concur with his dismissal and had ordered him reinstated.
Thomas Secretary of War ad interim despite the lack of vacancy in the office, since the dismissal of Stanton had been invalid.
Thomas without the required advice and consent of the Senate.
4.Conspiring, with Thomas and "other persons to the
House of Representatives unknown," to unlawfully prevent Stanton from continuing in office.
5.Conspiring to unlawfully
curtail faithful execution of the Tenure of Office Act.
6.Conspiring to "seize, take, and possess the property of
the United States in the Department of War."
7.Conspiring to "seize, take, and possess the property of the United
States in the Department of War" with specific intent to violate the Tenure of Office Act.
8.Issuing to Thomas the
authority of the office of Secretary of War with unlawful intent to "control the disbursements of the moneys appropriated
for the military service and for the Department of War."
9.Issuing to Major General William H. Emory orders with
unlawful intent to violate the Tenure of Office Act.
10.Making three speeches with intent to show disrespect for
the Congress among the citizens of the United States.
eleventh article was a summation of the first ten.
To fulfill promises made
during the impeachment trial, Johnson nominated John M. Schofield as War Secretary, who was confirmed. Stanberry resigned
and Johnson replaced him with William M. Evarts as Attorney General. He maintained his opposition to the Reconstruction Acts
and continued to veto bills seeking to admit seceded states under their provisions, and Congress continued to override his
vetoes. Johnson persisted in his perceived role as protector of the white race. The President had measurable support to run
for a full term and he was amenable to the idea. At the Democratic Convention, when he came in second on the first ballot
and faded from there, it became clear that he was too unpopular to run. Horatio Seymour received the Democratic presidential
nomination, which Johnson silently endorsed. One of Johnson's last significant acts as President was to grant unconditional
amnesty to all Confederates on Christmas Day 1868, after the election of Ulysses S. Grant but before he took office in March
1869. Earlier amnesties, requiring signed oaths and excluding certain classes of people, had been issued by Lincoln and by
Reading: Andrew Johnson : A Biography (Signature Series) (Hardcover). Description: On April 14, 1865, just as the American
Civil War came to an end, Abraham Lincoln was assassinated by a Confederate actor. The next morning Andrew Johnson was suddenly
elevated to the position of president of the United States at a time when the nation was still
suffering from the effects of war. This biography explores the enigma of the homeless and uneducated tailor whose spectacular
rise to power ended in disgrace. It relates how his term in office undermined the process of reconstruction and left a legacy
of racism. Over a century later, Johnson remains the only president of the United States to have been
impeached. The author explores Johnson's undeniable skills as a political leader and his stubborn attachment to a mythical
view of the America
of his youth, which proved to be his undoing. Continued below…
Journal: Known for his Carl Schurz: A Biography (LJ 2/15/82), Trefousse delivers the first Johnson study in years, a definitive
assessment of his career and presidency. Johnson's papers and other sources reveal his fatal idealization of the agrarian
utopia, his fierce advocacy of strict Constitutional constructionism, and his imprudent insistence upon the Republican Party’s
adoption of his views on race. Trefousse demonstrates that Johnson, because of his upbringing, was out of step with the great
changes emerging at the end of the Civil War. His stubborn attachment to his increasingly archaic views was responsible for
his political and military success, but also for his impeachment. A brilliant, compassionate portrait of a dynamic era of
social change and national healing, and of the tragic failure of an American leader. Not to be missed. --Susan E. Parker,
Harvard Law Sch. Library. About the Author: Hans L. Trefousse is professor of history at Brooklyn
College and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York. His other books
include The Radical Republicans, a path breaking history of Reconstruction.
Reading: Impeached: The Trial of President Andrew Johnson and the Fight for
Legacy. Description: From School Library Journal: One of our more controversial political figures,
Andrew Johnson came closer than any other U.S. President to being removed from office through impeachment. This study by Stewart
(Summer of 1787: The Men Who Invented the Constitution), a Washington lawyer who has argued against impeachment in Senate proceedings,
examines Johnson's rocky relationship with the post-Civil War radical Republicans. Continued below…
He breaks with
those historians who have suggested that Johnson followed what would have been Lincoln's
path to reconstruct the South, as he discusses the complex impeachment proceedings against Johnson and the effectiveness of
the impeachment process in calming political tensions, if not in removing Presidents from office. Readers who wish to broaden
their understanding of Lincoln in this anniversary year will do well to select this well-researched work even if their collection
already includes such examinations as Howard Mean's narrower The Avenger Takes His Place: Andrew Johnson and the 45 Days That
Changed the Nation.—Theresa McDevitt, Indiana Univ. of Pennsylvania Library. From Publishers Weekly: Fresh from his
masterful The Summer of 1787, Stewart takes on one of the seamiest events in American history: the vengeful impeachment of
successor as president; the Senate failed to convict Andrew Johnson by a single vote. At issue was the continuation of Lincoln's
plans to reintegrate the South into the union after the Civil War. But also at stake, as always, was party politics. Stewart
takes readers through a tangled web of motives and maneuverings in lively, unadorned prose. He's skilled at characterizing
his large cast of characters and, as a lawyer, has a practiced nose for skullduggery, of which there was much. Corruption
deeply marred the entire impeachment effort. Justifiably, Stewart holds his nose about most of the people involved and admires
few of them. As he sums it up, in 1868 none of the country's leaders was great, a few were good, all were angry, and far too
many were despicable. Stewart offers little analysis and advances no new ideas about what he relates, but he tells the story
as well as it's ever been told. Black and white photos.
Reading: History of the Impeachment of Andrew Johnson: And His Trial by the
Senate for High Crimes and Misdemeanors in Office (Forgotten Books) (Paperback). Description: The Impeachment of President Andrew Johnson was the biggest affair in the
during Reconstruction. The President was being tried on charges for breaking the Tenure of Office Act by removing Secretary
of War Edwin M. Stanton from office and replacing him with Adjutant General Lorenzo Thomas. Vice President Andrew Johnson
had succeeded to the presidency on April 15, 1865 after the assassination of Abraham Lincoln. His succession to the presidency
had a negative outlook on the country which led to controversies between Johnson and the Radical Republicans. Continued below…
Edwin M. Stanton,
Thaddeus Stevens and Benjamin F. Butler were the three most suspicious of the President and would usually meet with each other
along with other Radicals at Stanton's office or Stevens' home to plan Johnson's impeachment. Table of Contents: Publisher's
Preface; Preface; The Problem Of Reconstruction; The Baltimore Convention; Mr. Johnson's Accession To The Presidency; First
Attempt To Impeach The President; The Tenure-of-office Act; Impeachment Agreed To By The House; Impeachment Reported To The
Senate; Organization Of The Court Argument Of Counsel; Examination Of Witnesses And Their Testimony; A Conference Held And
The First Vote Taken; The Impeachers In A Maze. A Recess Ordered; Was It A Partisan Prosecution?; The Constitutional Power
Of Impeachment; Supplement.
Reading: Andrew Johnson: The American Presidents Series: The 17th President, 1865-1869 (Hardcover). Description: The unwanted president who ran afoul
of Congress over Reconstruction and was nearly removed from office. Andrew Johnson never expected to be president, but just
six weeks after becoming Abraham Lincoln’s vice president, the events at Ford’s Theatre thrust him into the nation’s
highest office. Continued below…
a nearly impossible task—to succeed America’s
greatest chief executive, to bind the nation’s wounds after the Civil War, and to work with a Congress controlled by
the so-called Radical Republicans. Annette Gordon-Reed, one of America’s leading historians
of slavery, shows how ill-suited Johnson was for this daunting task. His vision of reconciliation abandoned the millions of
former slaves (for whom he felt undisguised contempt) and antagonized congressional leaders, who tried to limit his powers
and eventually impeached him. The climax of Johnson’s presidency was his trial in the Senate and his acquittal by a
single vote, which Gordon-Reed recounts with drama and palpable tension. Despite his victory, Johnson’s term in office
was a crucial missed opportunity; he failed the country at a pivotal moment, leaving America
with problems that we are still trying to solve. About the Author: Annette Gordon-Reed is a professor of law at New York Law School,
where she has taught since 1992. She is the author of the celebrated Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings: An American Controversy,
co-author with Vernon Jordan
of Vernon Can Read!, and editor of Race on Trial: Law and Justice in American History. She lives in New York City.
Reading: The Presidency of Andrew Johnson (American Presidency Series) (Hardcover). Description: Andrew Johnson, who became president
after the assassination of Lincoln,
oversaw the most crucial and dramatic phase of Reconstruction. Historians have therefore tended to concentrate, to the exclusion
of practically everything else, upon Johnson's key role in that titanic event. Although his volume focuses closely on Johnson's
handling of Reconstruction, it also examines other important aspects of his administration, notably his foreign, economic,
and Indian policies. As one of the few historians to do this, the author provides a broader and more balanced picture of Johnson's
presidency than has been previously available. Continued below…
always been an enigma: much is known about what he did, little about why he did it. He wrote few letters, kept no diary, and
rarely confided in anyone. Most historians either admire or despise him, depending on whether they consider his Reconstruction
policies right or wrong. Castel achieves an objective reassessment of Johnson and his presidential actions by examining him
primarily in terms of his effectiveness in using power and by not judging him--as most other scholars have--on moralistic
or ideological grounds. The book begins with an overview of America at the end of the Civil War and a description
of Johnson's political career prior to 1865. Castel recounts the drama of Johnson's sudden inheritance of the presidency upon
death and then examines how Johnson organized and operated his administration. Johnson's formulation of a Reconstruction policy
for the defeated South comes under special scrutiny; Castel evaluates Johnson's motives for that policy, its implementation,
and its reception in both North and South. He descries and analyzes Johnson's quarrel with the Republican dominated Congress
over Reconstruction, the triumph of the Republicans in the election of 1866, the president's frustrated attempt to remove
Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton from office, his bitter dispute with General Ulysses S. Grant, and his impeachment by Congress.
Johnson's impeachment trial is covered in detail; Castel explains how it was that Johnson escaped conviction and removal from
office by the narrowest possible margin. The book concludes with a discussion of Johnson's place in history as judged by scholars
during the past one hundred years. This study sheds light on the nation's problems during the chaotic period between 1865
and 1869 and contributes a great deal to a much improved understanding of the seventeenth president. This book is part of
the American Presidency Series.
Recommended Reading: The First Ladies Fact Book: The Stories of the Women of the White House from Martha Washington
to Laura Bush (Hardcover: 725 pages). Description: Ladies Fact Book
is the definitive guide to the lives, achievements, triumphs, and tragedies of every first lady from Martha Washington to
Laura Bush. Arranged chronologically for easy reference and illustrated throughout with artwork, photographs, and documents,
it is a complete overview of everything you’d ever need to know: the major impact of their lives and the legacies they
left behind; their personalities and personal habits; their early lives; their family backgrounds, siblings, children, friends,
and foes. Continued below...
addition, The First Ladies Fact Book surpasses typical references, featuring selections of the most intimate correspondence
of each first lady, from letters to their families to letters to their presidential husbands. Delightful surprises abound,
including little-known information about the women’s hobbies, style of dress, habits of socializing, and peculiarities.
The more than 700 evocative photographs include sixteen pages of color photography of first-lady fashion, making it a wonderful combination of solid reference and
eye catching visual history.
Recommended Viewing: John Adams (HBO
Miniseries) (2008) (501 minutes). Description: Based on David
McCullough's bestselling biography, the HBO miniseries John Adams is
the furthest thing from a starry-eyed look atAmerica's
founding fathers and the brutal path to independence. Adams (Paul Giamatti), second president of the United States, is portrayed as a skilled orator and principled
attorney whose preference for justice over anti-English passions earns enemies. But he also gains the esteem of the first
national government of the United States, i.e., the Continental Congress, which seeks non-firebrands capable of making a reasoned
if powerful case for America's break from England's monarchy. The first thing one notices about John Adams' dramatizations
of congress' proceedings, and the fervent pro-independence violence in the streets of Boston and elsewhere, is that America's
roots don't look pretty or idealized here. Some horrendous things happen in the name of protest, driving Adams to push the cause of independence in a legitimate
effort to get on with a revolutionary war under the command of George Washington. Continued below...
the process isn't easy: not every one of the 13 colonies-turned-states is ready to incur the wrath of England, and behind-the-scenes
negotiations prove as much a part of 18th century congressional sessions as they do today. Besides this peek into a less-romanticized
version of the past, John Adams is also a story of the man himself. Adams' frustration at being forgotten or overlooked at
critical junctures of America's
early development--sent abroad for years instead of helping to draft the U.S. constitution--is
detailed. So is his dismay that the truth of what actually transpired leading to the signing of the Declaration of Independence
has been slowly forgotten and replaced by a rosier myth. But above all, John Adams is the story of two key ties: Adams' 54-year marriage to Abigail Adams (Laura Linney), every bit her husband's intellectual equal
and anchor, and his difficult, almost symbiotic relationship with Thomas Jefferson (Stephen Dillane) over decades. Giamatti,
of course, has to carry much of the drama, and if he doesn't always seem quite believable in the series' first half, he becomes
increasingly excellent at the point where an aging Adams becomes bitter over his place in history. Linney is marvelous, as is Dillane, Sarah
Polley as daughter Nabby, Danny Huston as cousin Samuel Adams, and above all Tom Wilkinson as a complex but indispensable