North Carolina Reconstruction
Aftermath and Reconstruction
North Carolina Civil War History
Before the War
In the decades between the end of the Civil War and Reconstruction
and the beginning of American involvement in World War I, North Carolina had witnessed significant economic, social, and political
change. On the eve of the war, North Carolina's 2.5 million citizens lived different, and in most cases better, lives than
their turn of the century predecessors. Health conditions, standards of living, educational opportunities, and access to information
about the larger world had all improved. The latter included news about the outbreak of war in August 1914 between Germany,
Austria-Hungary, Turkey, and Bulgaria, popularly known as the Central Powers, and France, Russia, Great Britain, and Japan,
known as the Allies. In the meantime, the degree of change from the
nineteenth century varied depending on where Tar Heels lived and what they did for a living. In addition, gender and race
still greatly influenced the opportunities available to North Carolinians, as they had in the previous era. Many women, both
black and white, and black men seized upon the war as a chance to test those limits.
Over 80 percent of North Carolina's population was still
rural in the 1910s, and agriculture still dominated the economy. An expanding urban-industrial crescent, however, stretched
from Charlotte north to Winston-Salem, then east to Raleigh. The cities of Greenville, Fayetteville, and Wilmington were important
commercial hubs in the eastern section of the state, and numerous smaller towns and mill villages also dotted the landscape.
Work and life in most of these cities and towns revolved around textile mills, tobacco factories, and other industries, although
Wilmington and, to a lesser degree, Fayetteville, remained shipping centers as they had been since the colonial era. Textile
magnates, tobacco barons, and other industrialists shaped economics and politics at both the local and state level. These
men would play central roles in directing North Carolina's war effort. Many of their sons, such as Robert March Hanes, saw action as Army officers.
Mill hands and tobacco industry workers found greater economic security in
the factories than on the farms that they or their parents had left behind, but neither their work nor their lives could be
described as profitable or comfortable. As a result, a number of North Carolina workers had made sporadic efforts to unionize
since the 1890s. These organizing efforts were largely put on hold during the war as laborers churned out uniforms and Lucky
Strike cigarettes for the "doughboys," as American soldiers were nicknamed. Others donned the khaki uniform themselves to
serve in France.
Agriculture remained the linchpin of North Carolina's economy throughout the
first half of the twentieth century. Before World War I, half of all Tar Heels still lived on farms. They supplied the crops
that nourished their fellow North Carolinians, as well as the voracious textile mills and tobacco factories. Between 1900
and 1914, North Carolina agriculture became more diverse, modern, and prosperous than it had been in previous decades. The World War created a boom in agricultural demand and prices, especially for North
Carolina's cotton and tobacco growers. Other Tar Heel farmers helped feed the Allied troops while many of their sons joined
the armed services. Three of the soldier-authors whose works are included in this site, Paul Green, Edgar Hallyburton, and
William Bradley Umstead, grew up on prosperous farms.
Umstead entered the world of North Carolina politics after his service in
World War I. Political scientist V. O. Key describes the Southern political realm in the 1900s as a "Progressive Plutocracy,"
and notes that North Carolina was by-and-large a one-party Democratic state, in which only a minority of Tar Heels had access
to the political system. Women and African Americans did not have the legal right to vote and the majority of white men chose
not to cast ballots in most elections.
While North Carolina's political system remained fairly closed on the eve
of World War I, state government was becoming more progressive, that is to say, more active and responsive to the needs and
interests of the people. The legislature stepped up nineteenth century efforts to improve public education, especially for white children, through increased spending, equalized funding, and compulsory
attendance laws. Progressive reformers also tried to ban child labor in
the years immediately preceding the war, though the best they could manage was limited regulation by 1917. The state proved
much more vigorous in preventing "the scourge of alcohol." North Carolina voters approved statewide prohibition in 1908.
North Carolina women had been the backbone of most of these reforms efforts
before the war. They also fought for more legal and political rights for women, but the North Carolina legislature voted against
the Nineteenth Amendment in 1920. Elsewhere in America, the democratic spirit engendered by the war propelled the amendment
to victory that same year, when the necessary three-fourths of the states had approved it.
In the meantime, prominent Tar Heels exercised a good deal of influence over
the federal government and America's approach to the war in Europe. First elected in 1912, President Woodrow Wilson, a southern
Democrat, peppered his administration with North Carolinians. Raleigh News and Observer publisher
Josephus Daniels became Secretary of the Navy and pushed, over Wilson's early objections, to expand the American fleet in
preparation for another war. Liberal journalist and expatriate Tar Heel Walter Hines Page served as ambassador to England.
After Britain entered the war in 1914, Page rejected the American tradition of neutrality in favor of support for the Allies.
David Houston, a Tar Heel native who had moved to Missouri, served as Secretary of Agriculture.
During the War
North Carolina had a powerful congressional delegation, whose views on American
involvement in the war diverged. Senator Furnifold Simmons chaired the important Finance Committee and came to share Page's
view that the U.S. should join the war. In the House of Representatives, Claude Kitchin reigned as Majority Leader. Unlike
Simmons, Kitchin remained a steadfast proponent of American neutrality in the European war. In 1916, Kitchin and one other
North Carolina congressman, Robert N. Page, voted against a large increase in army and navy appropriations. North Carolina
editorialists criticized Kitchin, but most citizens were not ready to go to war, though they sympathized with the suffering
of the French and Belgian people at the hands of the German army. The federal government produced posters urging Americans
to "Remember Belgium." North Carolina Governor Locke Craig made an official
appeal for Belgium relief in March 1916. A year later, when it seemed
clear that the United States would be drawn into the war by German submarine attacks on American shipping, Kitchin still opposed
On April 2, 1917, President Wilson delivered his war message to Congress and
envisioned a fight, not to preserve old European empires, but to protect American interests and to "make the world safe for
democracy." The majority of Senators and Representatives, including all members of the North Carolina delegation with the
exception of Kitchin, were swayed by events and Wilson's idealism and voted to declare war on Germany. Kitchin was one of
fifty House members who opposed the measure. In a dramatic speech, he explained that his conscience had charted a "path of
my duty and I have made up my mind to walk it, if I go barefooted and alone." Kitchin won favor with his colleagues and constituents
back home for his conviction and for his resolve to "work with all of my soul and might in defense" of the country after the
In Washington, Kitchin and other North Carolinians played important roles
in the war effort. Kitchin and Simmons pushed through a new federal income tax bill to help pay for the war. Senator Lee Overman
sponsored early legislation to give the President new powers to regulate business in the name of war production. North Carolina
Congressmen, such as James H. Pou, delivered rousing, patriotic speeches
in the House chamber and to military and civilian audiences in North Carolina. State officials gave similar orations, and
all of this rhetoric was widely circulated in the North Carolina press.
At the federal level, Josephus Daniels continued to oversee the American navy,
while Ambassador Page conferred with British officials and visited Allied and later American troops in the field. The stress
of work proved so great, however, that Page was forced to resign in 1918. Angus McLean, a successful Lumberton banker and
a future governor, became a member of the new War Finance Corporation. The WFC issued war bonds and used the proceeds to provide
loans to defense-related industries. McLean also took on the job of assistant Secretary of the Treasury. Walter Clark, chief Justice of the North Carolina Supreme Court and a long-time champion of the
rights of labor, women, and African Americans, served on the new National War Labor Board. In the meantime, Clark's son, Walter
Jr., served as an infantry captain in France.
Back home, North Carolinians quickly rallied around the flag and prepared
for war. Governor Thomas Walter Bickett assumed the helm of North Carolina government in 1917, less than one month before
the United States entered the war. Bickett had campaigned as one of North Carolina's leading Progressives, a record built
in two terms as Attorney General and a stint in the General Assembly. On the one hand, America's declaration of war overshadowed
Bickett's ambitious agenda of tax restructuring, educational expansion, and prison and public health reform. On the other
hand, the demands of World War I forced the state to become more involved in the economy and the private lives of its citizens
than most Progressive reformers had ever imagined or than conservative Democrats would ever have tolerated during peacetime.
The state's first task was to muster a military force. Actually, several Tar
Heel men and women already had begun serving as volunteers in France in the Allied armed forces and medical corps shortly
after the start of the war in 1914. Kiffin Yates Rockwell and James R. McConnell
flew for the French air force and were shot down and killed. Benjamin Muse
volunteered for the British Army in 1916 and became a prisoner of war of the Germans in November 1917. Once the U.S. declared
war, President Wilson also called North Carolina's National Guard into service. Waves of propaganda posters drew in additional
volunteers with masculine slogans, such as "Wanted: Husky Young Americans." The
biggest surge of recruits, however, came from a new draft instituted in May 1917, covering all healthy black and white men
between the ages of twenty-one and thirty-five.
While nearly 87,000 Tar Heel men and two hundred women left home for training
and combat, Governor Bickett, state and local governments, and private charities such as the Red Cross undertook an ambitious
campaign to mobilize the financial and material necessities for war. Public school teachers
and college and university faculty and students, especially at the University of North Carolina, also devoted themselves to
the war effort.
The American military needed massive amounts of food, fuel, armaments, and other material and the money to pay farmers and private industry for their
production. Where production fell short, North Carolinians made up the difference by finding creative ways to conserve everything
from potatoes to coal to socks in order to donate the surplus to the military. African Americans and white women in particular
contributed vigorously to the war effort to express their patriotism and prove to white men they were worthy of greater citizenship
Public and private groups attempted to mold public opinion as well as manage
resources. One set of tools was editorials and public addresses, many examples of which are included in this site. Governor
Bickett proved to be an especially inspiring orator, as illustrated by a speech he delivered in Ashe County. Schoolteachers also set lessons to music in patriotic ditties
for their impressionable young charges to sing. By far the most widely seen and influential element of wartime propaganda
was the posters produced by the federal Office of War Information.
After the War
American involvement in World War I was brief, but the experience significantly
changed the political and social environment in North Carolina. In 1919, North Carolina communities mourned their dead: 629
Tar Heels were killed in action, another 204 perished from battle wounds, and a final 1,542 succumbed to disease. Over 3,600
men had been wounded and others carried the mental scars of combat trauma and many Tar Heel doughboys buried their memories
for decades. Local communities welcomed their returning veterans with relatively little fanfare. By the early 1920s, however,
Armistice Day anniversary celebrations, Fourth of July speeches, and newly published histories of North Carolina regiments
all took great pride in commemorating North Carolina's service and sacrifices during the war.
Not all of North Carolina's wartime causalities occurred on the battlefield.
North Carolina, along with much of the rest of the world, also suffered a public health crisis. Before the war, poor rural
sanitation had been a breeding ground for flies carrying Typhoid fever. Between 1914 and 1917, Typhoid reached epidemic proportions,
killing 2,911 North Carolinians. In response, the state Board of Health launched a public awareness campaign to encourage
citizens to enclose their privies and cover open windows. Even small children learned their "Fly Catechism." The transport of men back and forth between Europe and America during the war also
spread Spanish Influenza, a deadly strain of flu that also produced pneumonia. Millions succumbed to the disease across the
globe and 13,644 North Carolinians died during the winter of 1918-19. Typhoid and other diseases killed another 1,542 Tar
Heel troops in France. Public health agencies, county Councils of Defense, and private charities rushed to set up makeshift
hospitals across the state to accommodate the thousands of patients. In
the 1920s, the twin epidemics also created the political momentum to permanently expand the budget and duties of the state
Board of Health.
In addition to health, the war provided the impetus for other public policy
initiatives. Between 1917 and 1919, state government took the lead in coordinating the war effort by mobilizing financial
resources and raw materials and molding public opinion in support of the war. It also assumed other duties beyond the immediate
demands of supplying the war and this government activism continued after the peace into the 1920s.
Finally, the war set the stage for profound changes that would shape North
Carolina's economy and the lives of farmers and workers in the 1920s. William Henry Glasson, in his 1920 essay on "Some Economic
Effects of the World War," notes that the war drove up prices on consumer
goods while devaluing the dollar, but the inflationary spike soon declined within a year. Of
more lasting significance was the fact that the artificial wartime boom for North Carolina agriculture and the textile industry
had turned to bust by the mid 1920s. North Carolina's tobacco manufacturing giants, however, rode out the recession as they
would the Great Depression. Tobacco workers had also managed to organize unions and force new contracts on their employers
in Winston-Salem at the end of the war. Tar Heel tobacco and cotton farmers saw prices drop first to prewar and then to turn
of the century levels. Eventually, North Carolina agriculture was dragged into a depression two years before the famous stock
market crash of 1929.
The textile industry also underwent two fundamental changes after the war.
First, peace robbed the mills of their military market and changing consumer tastes lessened demand for cotton fabrics. Owners
resolved to keep churning out goods at reduced prices. They would maintain a profit margin by reducing labor and production
costs. Second, a decade of hiring since 1910 had turned a prewar labor shortage into a postwar surplus of mill hands. Workers
had lost a vital source of leverage in labor relations and they felt helpless to resist the lay-offs, wage cuts, and increased
workloads that their employers imposed on them. Mill hands in Charlotte and elsewhere went out on strike in 1919, but their
protests were quickly crushed and the unionization effort in the textile industry was blunted for another decade. By 1929,
the industry had entered into a decade of economic crisis and labor unrest.
by Dr. Michael Sistrom
© Copyright 2004 by the University Library, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, all rights
Recommended Reading: North Carolinians in the Era of the Civil War
and Reconstruction (The University of North Carolina Press). Description: Although North Carolina
was a "home front" state rather than a battlefield state for most of the Civil War, it was heavily involved in the Confederate
war effort and experienced many conflicts as a result. North Carolinians were divided over
the issue of secession, and changes in race and gender relations brought new controversy. Blacks fought for freedom, women
sought greater independence, and their aspirations for change stimulated fierce resistance from more privileged groups. Republicans
and Democrats fought over power during Reconstruction and for decades thereafter disagreed over the meaning of the war and
Reconstruction. Continued below...
by well-known historians as well as talented younger scholars, this volume offers new insights into all the key issues of
the Civil War era that played out in pronounced ways in the Tar Heel State.
In nine fascinating essays composed specifically for this volume, contributors address themes such as ambivalent whites, freed
blacks, the political establishment, racial hopes and fears, postwar ideology, and North Carolina women. These issues of the
Civil War and Reconstruction eras were so powerful that they continue to agitate North Carolinians today.
Reading: Bluecoats and Tar Heels: Soldiers and Civilians in
Reconstruction North Carolina (New Directions
in Southern History) (Hardcover). Description: In Bluecoats and Tar Heels: Soldiers and Civilians in Reconstruction
North Carolina, Mark L. Bradley examines the complex relationship between U.S. Army soldiers and North Carolina civilians
after the Civil War. Continued below...
and political instability led the federal government to deploy elements of the U.S. Army in the Tar Heel State, but their twelve-year occupation
was marked by uneven success: it proved more adept at conciliating white ex-Confederates than at protecting the civil and
political rights of black Carolinians. Bluecoats and Tar Heels is the first book to focus on the army’s role as post-bellum
conciliator, providing readers the opportunity to discover a rich but neglected chapter in Reconstruction history.
Reading: A Short History of Reconstruction.
Review: In an attempt to document the important issues
of reconstruction, Eric Foner compiled his book Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution,
1863-1877. Foner addresses all the major issues leading up reconstruction, and then finishing his book shortly after the end
of reconstruction and the election of Rutherford B. Hayes in 1876. In the preface
of his book, Foner discusses the historiography of Reconstruction. He notes that during the early part of the twentieth century
many historians considered Reconstruction as one of the darkest periods of American history. Foner notes that this viewpoint
changed during the 1960s as revisionists shed new "light" on reconstruction. The revisionists saw Andrew Johnson as a stubborn
racist, and viewed the Radical Republicans as "idealistic reformers genuinely committed to black rights." The author notes
that recent studies of reconstruction argue that the Radicals were actually quite conservative, and most Radicals held on
to their racist views and put up very little fight as the whites once again began to govern the south. Continued below...
describes the African-American experience during the Civil War and Reconstruction. He argues that African-Americans were not
simply figures that took little or no action in the events of the day, and notes the enlistment of thousands of African-Americans
in the Union army during the war. Foner also notes that many of the African-Americans that eventually became civil leaders
had at one time served in the Union Army. He states, "For men of talent and ambition, the army flung open a door to advancement
and respectability." He notes that as reconstruction progressed, African-Americans were the targets of violence and racism.
that the transition of slaves into free laborers and equal citizens was the most drastic example of change following the end
of the war. He notes how African-Americans were eventually forced to return to the plantations, not as slaves but as share
croppers, and were thus introduced to a new form of slavery. He argues that this arrangement introduced a new class structure
to the South, and states "It was an economic transformation that would culminate, long after the end of Reconstruction, in
the consolidation of a rural proletariat composed of a new owning class of planters and merchants, itself subordinate to Northern
financiers and industrialists.” The author illustrates how both blacks and whites struggled to use the state and local
governments to develop their own interests and establish their respective place in the evolving social orders.
that he addresses in this excellent study is racism itself and the interconnection of race and class in the South.
he addresses is the expanded presence of federal authority, as well as a growing idea and commitment to the idea that equal
rights belonged to all citizens, regardless of race. Foner shows how both Northern and Southern blacks embraced the power
to vote, and, as Reconstruction ended, many blacks saw the loss of suffrage and the loss of freedom. Foner illustrates that
because the presence of blacks at the poll threatened the established traditions, corruption increased, which helped to undermine
the support for Reconstruction. The former leaders of the Confederacy were barred from political office, who were the regions
"natural leaders," a reversal of sympathies took place which portrayed the Southern whites as victims, and blacks unfit to
affected the North as well, but argues that it was obviously less revolutionary than it was in the South. Foner notes that
a new group of elites surfaced after the war, industrialists and railroad entrepreneurs emerged as powerful and influential
leaders alongside the former commercial elite. The Republicans in the North did attempt to improve the lives of Northern blacks.
However, there were far fewer blacks in the North, so it was more difficult for blacks to have their agendas and needs addressed
in the local legislatures. He states, "Most Northern blacks remained trapped in inferior housing and menial and unskilled
jobs." Foner adds that the few jobs blacks were able to acquire were constantly being challenged by the huge influx of European
is definitely worthy of his original volume. Reconstruction is a subject that can still be interpreted in several ways, including
the revisionist school of thought. Foner, however, seems to be as objective as possible on this subject, and has fairly addressed
all major issues that apply.
Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877. Review: This "masterful treatment of one of the most complex periods of American history" (New Republic) made history when it was originally published in
1988. It redefined how Reconstruction was viewed by historians and people everywhere in its chronicling of how Americans --
black and white -- responded to the unprecedented changes unleashed by the war and the end of slavery. This "smart book of
enormous strengths" (Boston Globe) has since gone on to become the classic work on the wrenching post-Civil War period --
an era whose legacy reverberates still today in the United States. Continued below...
the Author: Eric Foner, DeWitt Clinton Professor
of American History at Columbia
University, is the
author of numerous works on American history, including Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men: The Ideology of the Republican Party
Before the Civil War; Tom Paine and Revolutionary America; and The Story of American Freedom. He has served as president of
both the Organization of American Historians and the American Historical Association, and has been named Scholar of the Year
by the New York Council for the Humanities.
Sources: Sarah McCulloh Lemmon,
North Carolina's Role in the First World War (Raleigh: Division of Archives and History, 1966) and
R. Jackson Marshall III, Memories of World War I: North Carolina Doughboys on the Western Front (Raleigh:
Division of Archives and History, 1998). For Josephus Daniels' view of the Navy and his secretariat, see Daniels, Our
Navy at War (New York: G.H. Doran, 1922). On Walter Hines Page's tenure, see Ross Gregory, Walter
Hines Page; Ambassador to the Court of St. James's (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1970). For sources on
the role of government, see the introduction to The Home Front/Mobilizing Resources. On Claude Kitchin's evolving stance on the war, see Claude Kitchin and the Wilson War Policies
(New York: Russell & Russell, 1971). On the disease epidemics and the public health response, see David L. Cockrell, "A
Blessing in Disguise: the Influenza Pandemic of 1918 and North Carolina's Medical and Public Health Communities," North
Carolina Historical Review, 73 (July 1996): 309-27. For a general history of the American home front, see Robert H.
Zieger, America's Great War: World War I and the American Experience (Lanham, Md.: Rowman &
Littlefield Publishers, 2000).
The Reconstruction Era pages offer questions and answers to the following
subjects and topics: North Carolina and Civil War Reconstruction Era History: The results, details,
purpose, facts, goal of the Reconstruction Acts; The Civil War Reconstruction Acts accomplished what primary objective? Includes
a comprehensive Reconstruction Timeline with pages on the Reconstruction achievements, accomplishments, with goals (missed
opportunities) as well as the weaknesses of the Reconstruction, restrictive Civil Rights Acts, and a failed military rule.