What is Popular Sovereignty?
Slavery, Secession, Civil War
What is popular sovereignty? A basic study begins with the definition of
popular sovereignty, examples of popular sovereignty, and the results of popular sovereignty. Who coined the term popular
sovereignty, how was it influenced by sectionalism, or did sectionalism arise out of popular sovereignty, and what role did
it play, if any, in Southern secession and the American Civil War?
Popular Sovereignty is the political-legal principle that all legitimate
political authority within a society derives ultimately from the will or consent of the subject population.
“We the People . . . do ordain
and establish this Constitution.”
These words are contained in the United States Constitution's Preamble and give expression to the doctrine of popular sovereignty.
When Congress established Kansas Territory, it was accomplished under the banner of popular sovereignty. The doctrine known
as popular sovereignty meant that the people of the territory could decide for themselves
by popular vote whether or not Kansas would have slavery. The doctrine was therefore considered both popular and
The Kansas Nebraska Act of 1854 repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1820: the Missouri Compromise had limited slavery in the Louisiana Purchase area
to south of the 36°30" line of latitude, the southern boundary of Missouri. (Missouri was the only exception to this rule.)
The newly ratified Kansas Nebraska Act threatened the balance of power because prior to 1850 there was an equal
number of free and slave states, which maintained equality in the United States Senate.
Most Southerners approved of popular sovereignty because it allowed them
more opportunities for expansion. The decision, however, angered many Northerners; they viewed it as a sellout of
the Missouri Compromise and feared that the floodgates would 'open to slavery' in all of the new territories. Both sides
rushed to claim Kansas, both sides sent settlers to the territory, and both sides started fighting over the outcome of the
decision. This resulted in several years of fighting and violence known as "Bleeding Kansas."
The ultimate failure of popular
sovereignty was met with Southern secession and the Civil War in 1861.
Although the doctrine's proponents had hoped to prevent sectional strife, popular sovereignty had not only failed to avert
civil war, but also seemed to exacerbate sectionalism.
Sources: Yale Law
School, The University
of Chicago Library, Library of Congress, National Archives, National
The Impending Crisis, 1848-1861
(Paperback), by David M. Potter. Review: Professor Potter treats an incredibly complicated and misinterpreted time period with unparalleled
objectivity and insight. Potter masterfully explains the climatic events that led to Southern secession – a greatly
divided nation – and the Civil War: the social, political and ideological conflicts; culture; American
expansionism, sectionalism and popular sovereignty; economic and tariff systems; and slavery. In other words, Potter places under the microscope the root causes and origins of the Civil War. He conveys
the subjects in easy to understand language to edify the reader's understanding (it's not like reading some dry
old history book). Delving beyond surface meanings and interpretations,
this book analyzes not only the history, but the historiography of the time period as well. Continued below…
rejects the historian's tendency to review the period with all the benefits of hindsight. He simply traces the events, allowing
the reader a step-by-step walk through time, the various views, and contemplates the interpretations of contemporaries and
other historians. Potter then moves forward with his analysis. The Impending Crisis is the absolute gold-standard of historical
writing… This simply is the book by which, not only other antebellum era books, but all history books should be judged.
The following topics and subjects include from summary, causes or reasons,
origins to results.
What Hath God Wrought: The Transformation of America, 1815-1848 (Oxford History of the United States) (Hardcover) (928 pages). Review: The newest volume in the renowned Oxford History of the United States-- A brilliant portrait
of an era that saw dramatic transformations in American life The Oxford History of the United States is by far the most respected multi-volume history of our nation.
The series includes two Pulitzer Prize winners, two New York Times bestsellers, and winners of the Bancroft and Parkman Prizes.
Now, in What Hath God Wrought, historian Daniel Walker Howe illuminates the period from the battle of New
Orleans to the end of the Mexican-American War, an era when the United
States expanded to the Pacific and won control over the richest part of the North American
continent. Continued below.
narrative portrays revolutionary improvements in transportation and communications that accelerated the extension of the American
empire. Railroads, canals, newspapers, and the telegraph dramatically lowered travel times and spurred the spread of information.
These innovations prompted the emergence of mass political parties and stimulated America's economic development from
an overwhelmingly rural country to a diversified economy in which commerce and industry took their place alongside agriculture.
In his story, the author weaves together political and military events with social, economic, and cultural history. He examines
the rise of Andrew Jackson and his Democratic party, but contends that John Quincy Adams and other Whigs--advocates of public
education and economic integration, defenders of the rights of Indians, women, and African-Americans--were the true prophets
of America's future. He reveals the power
of religion to shape many aspects of American life during this period, including slavery and antislavery, women's rights and
other reform movements, politics, education, and literature. Howe's story of American expansion -- Manifest Destiny -- culminates
in the bitterly controversial but brilliantly executed war waged against Mexico
to gain California and Texas for the United States. By 1848, America had been transformed. What Hath God Wrought provides a monumental narrative
of this formative period in United States
Recommended Reading: Lincoln
and Douglas: The Debates that Defined America
(Simon & Schuster) (February 5, 2008) (Hardcover). Description: In 1858, Abraham Lincoln was known as a successful Illinois lawyer who had achieved some prominence in state politics
as a leader in the new Republican Party. Two years later, he was elected president and was on his way to becoming the greatest
chief executive in American history. What carried this one-term congressman from obscurity to fame was the campaign he mounted
for the United States Senate against the country's most formidable politician, Stephen A. Douglas, in the summer and fall
of 1858. Lincoln challenged Douglas directly in one of his greatest speeches -- "A house divided
against itself cannot stand" -- and confronted Douglas on the questions of slavery and the inviolability of the Union in seven fierce debates. As this brilliant narrative by the prize-winning Lincoln
scholar Allen Guelzo dramatizes, Lincoln would emerge a predominant
national figure, the leader of his party, the man who would bear the burden of the national confrontation. Continued below.
Of course, the great issue between
Lincoln and Douglas was slavery. Douglas was the champion of "popular sovereignty," of letting states and territories decide for themselves
whether to legalize slavery. Lincoln drew a moral line, arguing
that slavery was a violation both of natural law and of the principles expressed in the Declaration of Independence. No majority
could ever make slavery right, he argued. Lincoln lost that Senate race to Douglas,
though he came close to toppling the "Little Giant," whom almost everyone thought was unbeatable. Guelzo's Lincoln and Douglas
brings alive their debates and this whole year of campaigns and underscores their centrality in the greatest conflict in American
history. The encounters between Lincoln and Douglas engage a key question in American political life: What is democracy's
purpose? Is it to satisfy the desires of the majority? Or is it to achieve a just and moral public order? These were the real
questions in 1858 that led to the Civil War. They remain questions for Americans today.
Recommended Reading: CAUSES OF THE CIVIL WAR: The Political, Cultural, Economic and Territorial Disputes Between the North and South.
Description: While South Carolina's preemptive strike on
Fort Sumter and Lincoln's
subsequent call to arms started the Civil War, South Carolina's secession and Lincoln's military actions were simply the last in a chain of events stretching as far back
as 1619. Increasing moral conflicts and political debates over slavery-exacerbated by the inequities inherent between an established
agricultural society and a growing industrial one-led to a fierce sectionalism which manifested itself through cultural, economic,
political and territorial disputes. Continued below...
This historical study reduces sectionalism to its most fundamental form,
examining the underlying source of this antagonistic climate. From protective tariffs to the expansionist agenda, it illustrates
the ways in which the foremost issues of the time influenced relations between the North and the South. "Sectionalism, Popular
Sovereignty, and tariffs smashed a wedge between the North and South and led to the greatest conflict in American history
- the Civil War. [A] refreshing and compelling read...perfect for the Civil War buff and the individual interested in American
Recommended Reading: Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era (Oxford History of the United States) (Hardcover: 952 pages). Description: Published in 1988 to universal acclaim, this single-volume treatment of the Civil
War quickly became recognized as the new standard in its field. James M. McPherson, who
won the Pulitzer Prize for this book, impressively combines a brisk writing style with an admirable thoroughness.
James McPherson's fast-paced narrative fully integrates the political, social, and military events that crowded the two decades
from the outbreak of one war in Mexico to the ending of another at Appomattox. Packed with drama and analytical insight, the book vividly
recounts the momentous episodes that preceded the Civil War including the Dred Scott decision, the Lincoln-Douglas debates,
and John Brown's raid on Harper's Ferry. It flows into a masterful chronicle of the war itself--the battles, the strategic
maneuvering by each side, the politics, and the personalities. Particularly notable are McPherson's new views on such matters
as Manifest Destiny, Popular Sovereignty, Sectionalism, the slavery expansion issue in the 1850s, the origins of the
Republican Party, the causes of secession, internal dissent and anti-war opposition in the North and the South, and the reasons
for the Union's victory. Continued below...
title refers to the sentiments that informed both the Northern and Southern views of the conflict. The South seceded in the
name of that freedom of self-determination and self-government for which their fathers had fought in 1776, while the North
stood fast in defense of the Union founded by those fathers as the bulwark of American liberty. Eventually, the North had to grapple
with the underlying cause of the war, slavery, and adopt a policy of emancipation as a second war aim. This "new birth of
freedom," as Lincoln called it, constitutes the proudest legacy of America's bloodiest conflict. This authoritative volume makes sense of that vast
and confusing "second American Revolution" we call the Civil War, a war that transformed a nation and expanded our heritage
of liberty. . Perhaps more than any other book, this one belongs on the bookshelf
of every Civil War buff.
Arguing about Slavery: John Quincy Adams and the Great Battle in the United States Congress. Description: In the
1830s, slavery was so deeply entrenched that it could not even be discussed in Congress, which had enacted a "gag rule" to
ensure that anti-slavery petitions would be summarily rejected. This stirring book chronicles the parliamentary battle to
bring "the peculiar institution" into the national debate, a battle that some historians have called "the Pearl
Harbor of the slavery controversy." Continued below...
The campaign to make slavery officially and respectably debatable was waged
by John Quincy Adams who spent nine years defying gags, accusations of treason, and assassination threats. In the end he made
his case through a combination of cunning and sheer endurance. Telling this story with a brilliant command of detail, Arguing
About Slavery endows history with majestic sweep, heroism, and moral weight.