|American Civil War HOMEPAGE
|American Civil War
|Causes of the Civil War : What Caused the Civil War
|Organization of Union and Confederate Armies: Infantry, Cavalry, Artillery
|Civil War Navy: Union Navy and Confederate Navy
|American Civil War: The Soldier's Life
|Civil War Turning Points
|American Civil War: Casualties, Battles and Battlefields
|Civil War Casualties, Fatalities & Statistics
|Civil War Generals
|American Civil War Desertion and Deserters: Union and Confederate
|Civil War Prisoner of War: Union and Confederate Prison History
|Civil War Reconstruction Era and Aftermath
|American Civil War Genealogy and Research
|American Civil War Pictures - Photographs
|African Americans and American Civil War History
|American Civil War Store
|American Civil War Polls
|NORTH CAROLINA HISTORY
|North Carolina Civil War History
|North Carolina American Civil War Statistics, Battles, History
|North Carolina Civil War History and Battles
|North Carolina Civil War Regiments and Battles
|North Carolina Coast: American Civil War
|HISTORY OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA
|Western North Carolina and the American Civil War
|Western North Carolina: Civil War Troops, Regiments, Units
|North Carolina: American Civil War Photos
|Cherokee Chief William Holland Thomas
|HISTORY OF THE CHEROKEE INDIANS
|Cherokee Indian Heritage, History, Culture, Customs, Ceremonies, and Religion
|Cherokee Indians: American Civil War
|History of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indian Nation
|Cherokee War Rituals, Culture, Festivals, Government, and Beliefs
|Researching your Cherokee Heritage
|Civil War Diary, Memoirs, Letters, and Newspapers
Brigadier General Alfred Eugene
(January 11, 1807 — October 30, 1889)
|Gen. A. E. Jackson
|General Alfred Jackson
Name: Alfred Eugene Jackson
Born: January 11, 1807, Davidson City, TN.
Died: October 30, 1889, Jonesborough (aka Jonesboro), TN.
Buried: Jonesborough (Jonesboro), TN.
Pre-War Profession: Farmer, merchant.
War Service: 1861, staff major, quartermaster, paymaster,
served in East Tennessee; April 1863, Brigadier General in command of a brigade, served in the Cumberland Gap and southwest Virginia; unfit
for field service in November 1864; remained on staff duty under Maj. Gen. Breckinridge until the war ended.
Brig. Gen. Alfred Eugene Jackson, commonly referenced as A. E. Jackson, was a lifelong resident of Tennessee
and slaveholder and farmer prior to the Civil War. Lacking any prior military service, the aged brigadier exhibited poor
leadership and the inability to adapt and adopt the warrior's mindset, therefore forcing poor morale and contention
among the soldiers who served in his brigade. On September 8, 1863, he tasted his only victory of note by capturing 300
soldiers of the 100th Ohio Infantry at Limestone, TN. When the Confederates were pushed out of Knoxville in December, Jackson would lead a brigade while assigned to the rugged southern Appalachian Mountains
of East Tennessee. He would later assume temporary control of the Rebel forces at Saltville, VA., during the first fight over the prized salt production facilities on October 2, 1864. With a large Federal command
marching toward Saltville, Jackson led the troops well as they prepared fortifications
and rifle pits, but Richmond had already made a career changing
decision for the Tennessean, and during the next month of November, 1864, Jackson was declared unfit for the field and ordered
to light duty on Maj. Gen. John C. Breckinridge's staff, where he would remain until the conflict ended.
They Call Me "Old Mudwall"
most generals of the conflict, Brig. Gen. Alfred E. Jackson lacked any formal military training and had never donned a uniform,
but was a farmer who owned 20 slaves prior to the Civil War. Jackson received his disparaging nom de guerre,
the moniker "Old Mudwall," by troops under his authority. Some men under the Tennessean's leadership routinely
complained to headquarters with statements accusing Jackson of being unfit for command to pointing out how the farmer
turned brigadier had only commanded 20 slaves prior to the war. For much of the war, Alfred Jackson did little to gain the
confidence of his men. He was known to discipline officers in the presence of enlisted men — chastening actions that
a slaveholder would openly practice — but such harmful conduct toward military personnel was crippling to
morale and esprit de corps of the entire unit, and it was shunned by veteran soldiers and grads of
West Point and VMI.
|Brig. Gen. Alfred Jackson
|Alfred Jackson post war astride his favorite mount Jeff Davis
Albumen print of Alfred Eugene Jackson. Undated. Post war image of Brig. Gen. Jackson astride his favorite horse Jeff
Davis. The brigadier was rather fond of this mount and included ole Davis in his will. If Jackson should
precede the handsome steed in death, Jeff Davis shall remain on the farm where he is to be later buried. When Jackson
was said to be unfit for field duty and then stripped of command and reassigned to light duty on Breckinridge's staff, it
was none other than the other Jeff Davis who would approve the reassignment of the aged Tennessean. Image has been
altered from the original. This rare photo is courtesy Tennessee State Library and Archives.
in a Name
Jacksons, one dogged and the other neurotic. Whereas Lt. Gen. "Stonewall" Jackson could be seen
resonating leadership and confidence on the field, Brig. Gen. "Old Mudwall" Jackson was said to be a rather nervous
man. Regarding both "Old Mudwall" and "Stonewall," it was the troops they commanded that bestowed the nom
de guerres. While
the wise "Stonewall" Jackson executed aggressive tactical decisions and exuded
mettle in the face of the enemy, "Old Mudwall," on the other hand, appeared to be quite nervous in any given skirmish and
apprehensive regarding decisions in the field. "Stonewall"
was a strategist who was well-known for pressing the
action and carrying the day, but the other Jackson, to the contrary, was (stuck) like that proverbial deer staring at the
headlights and unsure of its next decision. Whilst "Stonewall" was resolute and commanding in the throes of battle, "Old
Mudwall" was unassertive on the battlefield — so the namesake stuck.
Captain James W. Terrell,
of the Thomas Legion, was one of many who wrote to Governor Vance and stated
that Jackson was trying to destroy the legion by making it his brigade. Notwithstanding, reports of poor discipline
in the ranks of the Jackson brigade may be more intrinsic to the soldiers themselves and should therefore share
strongly in the equation of culpability with Jackson.
As brigade general, A. E. Jackson would command Thomas' Legion, which, for much of his generalship,
comprised most if not all of his entire brigade. The legion, which included some 400 Cherokee Indians, had fielded some
2,500 men in 1862, but the unit, like other legions of the war, would be more a legion in name only as exigencies of
conflict required its artillery and cavalry to be detached. Since the legion had at various times formed all of Jackson's
Brigade, conflict was inevitable between Colonel William H. Thomas, the legion's namesake, and the brigadier who had
assumed authority of Thomas' unit.
1864, several officers of Thomas' Legion signed a petition stating that Jackson was "a man of irritable temper
intensified by diseased nerves and aggravated by being in a position for which the man is morally and physically unfit."
This letter further stated that "General Jackson would reprimand the officers in the presence of the enlisted men," which
only added to the list of grievances. The letter was forwarded from Gov. Zebulon Vance and read by President Jeff Davis.
The scathing allegations against Jackson would gain traction when Colonel William P. Johnston, President
Jefferson Davis' aide, stated to Davis that Brig. Gen.
Jackson was a "very nervous person under responsibility." (O.R., 30, IV, 602*). This rhetoric became action when General Bragg wrote Davis in 1864 and recommended that Jackson be relieved of
command and that Col. William H. Thomas resume control of the Thomas Legion (which Bragg knew had formed the nucleus of the brigade under Jackson).
But the organization change would have to wait. Having been signed on May 5, 1864, General
Order 105 would order the Thomas Legion to return to western North Carolina, but the exigencies of war would postpone
the order by first moving the legion into the Shenandoah Valley to serve under Lt. Gen. Jubal Early.
While the soldiers enjoyed a laissez-faire atmosphere under Col. Thomas, Brig. Gen. Jackson was said
to be a strict disciplinarian. Lt. Col. W. W. Stringfield, Thomas' Legion, recorded the unit's history for North
Carolina in 1901. Although he made critical remarks for some soldiers, Stringfield gave the following account of the
brigadier. "[General Alfred E. Jackson] was a cultivated
gentleman and personally a brave man. He was a good man and always managed the men to the best advantage in so hostile a region.
He was personally and scrupulously honest, and demanded the same of his men; but he was a little too strict for the "old soldier"
ideas of those who wanted to prowl." W. W. Stringfield,
10 May, 1901. Clark,
Walter, 1846-1924, ed. Histories of the Several Regiments and Battalions from North Carolina, in the Great War 1861-'65.
Vol. III, p. 743.
*Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies;
hereinafter cited as O.R.
|A. E. Jackson's Brigade
|Cherokee Indians of Jackson's Brigade at New Orleans Reunion in 1903
|Alfred E. Jackson
|Brig. Gen. Alfred E. Jackson
they were too much alike may be the single greatest reason why they remained
at odds with each other.
E. Jackson and William H. Thomas had much more in common than not. The two alpha males were in their mid-50s when
the war broke out and were from adjoining homogenous mountain regions; both
had owned slaves prior to the conflict; each had amassed fortune and stature; neither had spent a single day of
his life in the military prior to the four year conflict; the leadership of both Jackson and Thomas
was often viewed with skepticism by generals reporting to Richmond; the
would conclude the war with physical and or mental disabilities; both were insolvent in 1865 and would spend the
remainder of their lives striving to regain their former estates; and whereas
each would outlive the majority of all Americans, the two senior citizens would
have several years to reflect upon and contemplate the many decisions and actions of a lifetime. Jackson would pass in
1889 at 82 years young and across the border in North Carolina, Thomas, aged 88, would be laid to rest in 1893.
Brig. Gen. A. E. Jackson, like many general officers
from the South, was a slaveholder who had attained wealth and prominence. But unlike the majority of Confederate generals,
Jackson, who had spent much of his adult life farming, had never donned the military uniform prior to the conflict.
Colonel W. H. Thomas, commanding Thomas' Legion, was
also a slave owner, but to his credit he had amassed in his 50 plus years an array of experiences to warrant solid complaints
on poor leadership, but only through proper channels of course. Thomas, prior to Civil War, had owned stores,
acquired a law practice, was elected as an N.C. state senator, and served as Chief of the Eastern Cherokee, which he
would continue through the war by wearing the hat of both colonel and chief.
The unit known as Thomas' Legion of Cherokee Indians and Highlanders was mustered in with
the belief that it would be assigned only in defense of the East Tennessee and adjacent North Carolina mountains. But
war being war and the exigencies of combat requiring hard, difficult decisions, it was not practical to have such
a large force of some 2,500 men, consisting of infantry, cavalry, and artillery, left intact for the entire four year
fight. Once the legion was thrust over the mountains and into East Tennessee and placed in a brigade under the command
of Brig. Gen. A. E. Jackson, morale faltered. Since the legion comprised the entire brigade, save another artillery battery
at various times, it brought confusion and many complaints from the troops while questioning who was their commander.
fairness to Jackson, Thomas, who assumed the role of co-captain of the legion, did absolutely nothing to extinguish
the rising flames of anger in the ranks, but he himself fueled it. Jackson was "Old
Mudwall," but the Thomas Legion would soon assume a few monikers for itself — from useless to utterly worthless
according to some reports by division and corps generals. As the soldiers under Jackson longed for duty on the front, as in
front door of hearth and home, they daily recalled the promises of being stationed only in
defense of the mountain region. So it was the path of least resistance for the ranks to vent their discontentment by bickering
and complaining about Jackson. But "Old Mudwall" would engage and further enrage the already fractured unit by leveling petty
charges and minor infractions at its officers in the front of the entire brigade. Morale and bitterness would continue
to drop to such levels that some soldiers under Jackson returned to North Carolina with the likelihood of facing desertion
charges rather than serve another day under the so-called unfit leader.
|Brig. Gen. Alfred E. Jackson
|Tennessean and Brig. Gen. Alfred E. Jackson
|Gen. Alfred Eugene Jackson
A. E. Jackson was formerly paymaster at Knoxville, and was appointed brigadier general last spring. He is an East Tennessean
and was a citizen of wealth and prominence. I make these statements because you were not fully satisfied what General Jackson
it was. I hear that he has very complete topographical knowledge of the county, but is a very nervous person under responsibility,
although undoubtedly brave and energetic." Letter dated September 5, 1863, from William Preston Johnston, Colonel and Aide-de-Camp,
to President Jefferson Davis. Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies, Series 1, Volume 30, part
IV, p. 602.
soldiers stated publicly their dislike of Jackson, it would be remiss to discount or discard the brigadier's abilities.
The Tennessean was a self-made man who had evolved into an expert wartime strategist. He understood the strategic
importance of the railways and was by all accounts a seasoned topographer. While the aged general was an expert
of the ground to which he was assigned to defend, he sought throughout the conflict to use the terrain for an advantage. Whereas Jackson was
undoubtedly brave and energetic, the same words could not always be said of the troops he commanded. Because Headquarters
Confederate States constructed and then permitted the contentious command structure of the Jackson Brigade, one
will never realize the full potential of the mature brigadier.
soldier serving under the old brigadier would say in a single sentence what many had tried to convey through lengthy
prose during the entire war, that Jackson was a "man who cared only about himself." In
the several complaints that Thomas would bring against Jackson during the conflict, many had the eerie semblance as
though he was actually talking about himself. Whereas the two highlanders were similar in many respects and neither was accustomed
to riding shotgun, in unawares during the course of a lengthy conflict they were creating a two-headed
commander with monstrous results. (See Brigadier General Alfred Eugene Jackson v. Colonel William Holland Thomas.)
Although Thomas often berated Jackson, there was no love lost between these
two men, so when he said that "Jackson never governed any man in his life, just his 20 slaves, and he received his command
by accident," it came as no surprise to Jackson. The Thomas Jackson friction rose
to such a level that it led to Thomas receiving his first of many court-martials. Allegations would be hurled at Thomas
and protests would be aimed at Jackson, in what resembled a schoolyard squabble with neither swallowing his pride
and taking a hike on the highway of humility. But as Richmond had tried at times to place pacifiers in the mouths of the bickering
commanders, there was actually a war going on.
On a few occasions petitions circulated through the ranks of the
Thomas Legion with some men stating their grievances against Jackson, but it was the legion's James W. Terrell who wrote to Governor Vance and stated that "Jackson is trying to destroy our organization. It is
no longer Thomas' Legion, but Thomas' Regiment, Walker's Battalion and Levi's Battery, in order to make it a show of
a his brigade." (O.R., 1, Vol. 33, p. 1137.)
It was only after the likes of Bragg, Longstreet, Breckinridge, and Jefferson Davis had been thoroughly
briefed with the present state of affairs, that Jackson's military service would turn to that of a nonsupervisory
role. Jackson was initially relieved of command
and sent to the Army of Tennessee (O.R. 37, I, 753), but as his nervous condition worsened, he was again dismissed from command (O.R., 45, I, 1240) and reassigned to the staff of Breckinridge, where he would remain until the war concluded.
With the anger and nervousness of Jackson being witnessed and reported
by several in the army over an extended period of the war, the general may have been suffering from post traumatic
stress disorder, a condition that had yet to be recognized. The former Confederate officer would gradually reclaim
a portion of his East Tennessee estate, where he would remain until his death on October 30, 1889. See also Brig. Gen. Alfred E. Jackson History and General Alfred Eugene Jackson Biography.
(Additional sources and related reading below.)
Recommended Reading: Shook over Hell: Post-Traumatic Stress,
Vietnam, and the Civil War. Description: Eric T. Dean Jr., a lawyer whose interest in the Civil War prompted him to return
to school to obtain a Ph.D. in history, makes a unique contribution to Civil War studies with his research on the psychological
effects of the war on its veterans. Digging through the pension records of Civil War vets, Dean documents the great number
who, suffering from severe psychological problems triggered by intense combat experience, were dutifully provided with disability
pensions by the U.S. government. Continued below...
Dean's central thesis--that these veterans provide a mirror
for the experiences of their counterparts in Vietnam a century later--is supported with lucid reasoning. Of particular interest
are the many stories of intense Civil War combat and its psychological aftereffects, including many cases of Civil War veterans
committed to asylums well into the 1890s--case studies seldom found in standard histories which offer painful testimony to
the war's enormous impact on the nation.
|Gen. Alfred Eugene Jackson Historical Marker
|General Alfred Jackson
Recommended Reading: Storm in the Mountains:
Thomas' Confederate Legion of Cherokee Indians and Mountaineers (Thomas' Legion: The Sixty-ninth North Carolina Regiment). Description: Vernon H. Crow, Storm in the Mountains, spent 10 years conducting extensive Thomas Legion's research. Crow was granted
access to rare manuscripts, special collections, and privately held diaries which add great depth to this rarely discussed
Civil War legion. He explores and discusses the unit's formation, fighting history, and life of the legion's commander--Cherokee
chief and Confederate colonel--William Holland Thomas. Continued below...
and photographs allow the reader to better understand and relate to the subjects discussed. It also contains rosters
which is an added bonus for researchers and genealogists. Crow, furthermore, left no stone unturned while examining the
many facets of the Thomas Legion and his research is conveyed on a level that scores with Civil War students and scholars
Recommended Reading: North Carolina Troops, 1861-1865: A Roster (Volume XVI: Thomas's Legion) (Hardcover, 537 pages),
North Carolina Office of Archives and History. Description: The volume begins with an authoritative 246-page history of
Thomas's Legion. The history, including Civil War battles and campaigns, is followed by a complete roster and service
records of the field officers, staff, and troops that served in the legion. A thorough index completes the volume. Continued
of North Carolina Troops: A Roster contains the history and roster of the most unusual North Carolina Confederate Civil
War unit, significant because of the large number of Cherokee Indians who served in its ranks. Thomas's Legion was the creation
of William Holland Thomas, an influential businessman, state legislator, and Cherokee chief. He initially raised a small
battalion of Cherokees in April 1862, and gradually expanded his command with companies of white soldiers raised in western
eastern Tennessee, and Virginia.
By the end of 1862, Thomas's Legion comprised an infantry regiment and a battalion of infantry and cavalry. An artillery battery
was added in April 1863. Furthermore, in General Early's Army of the Valley, the Thomas Legion was well-known for its fighting
prowess. It is also known for its pivotal role in the last Civil War battle east of the Mississippi
River. The Thomas Legion mustered more than 2,500 soldiers and it closely resembled a brigade. With troop roster, muster records, and Compiled Military Service Records (CMSR) this volume
is also a must have for anyone interested in genealogy and researching Civil War ancestors. Simply stated, it is an outstanding
source for genealogists.
Generals in Gray Lives of the Confederate Commanders. Description: When Generals in Gray was published in 1959, scholars
and critics immediately hailed it as one of the few indispensable books on the American Civil War. Historian Stanley Horn,
for example, wrote, "It is difficult for a reviewer to restrain his enthusiasm in recommending a monumental book of this high
quality and value." Here at last is the paperback edition of Ezra J. Warner’s magnum opus with its concise, detailed
biographical sketches and—in an amazing feat of research—photographs of all 425 Confederate generals. Continued
The only exhaustive
guide to the South’s command, Generals in Gray belongs on the shelf of anyone interested in the Civil War. RATED 5 STARS!
Generals in Blue: Lives of the Union Commanders (Hardcover). Description:
More than forty years after its original publication, Ezra J. Warner’s Generals in Blue is now available in paperback
for the first time. Warner’s classic reference work includes intriguing biographical sketches and a rare collection
of photos of all 583 men who attained the rank of general in the Union Army. Here are the West Point graduates and the
political appointees; the gifted, the mediocre, and the inexcusably bad; those of impeccable virtue and those who abused their
position; the northern-born, the foreign-born, and the southerners who remained loyal to the Union.
Warner’s valuable introduction
discusses the criteria for appointment and compares the civilian careers of both Union and Confederate generals, revealing striking differences in the two groups. Generals
in Blue is that rare book—an essential volume for scholars, a prized item for buffs, and a biographical dictionary that
the casual reader will find absorbing.
War High Commands (1040 pages) (Hardcover). Description: Based on nearly five decades of research, this magisterial work is a biographical
register and analysis of the people who most directly influenced the course of the Civil War, its high commanders. Numbering
3,396, they include the presidents and their cabinet members, state governors, general officers of the Union
and Confederate armies (regular, provisional, volunteers, and militia), and admirals and commodores of the two navies.
Civil War High Commands will become a cornerstone reference work on these personalities and the meaning of their commands,
and on the Civil War itself. Continued below.
Errors of fact and interpretation concerning the high commanders are legion in the Civil War literature, in reference
works as well as in narrative accounts. The present work brings together for the first time in one volume the most reliable
facts available, drawn from more than 1,000 sources and including the most recent research. The biographical entries include
complete names, birthplaces, important relatives, education, vocations, publications, military grades, wartime assignments,
wounds, captures, exchanges, paroles, honors, and place of death and interment. In addition to its main component, the biographies, the volume also includes a number of essays, tables,
and synopses designed to clarify previously obscure matters such as the definition of grades and ranks; the difference between
commissions in regular, provisional, volunteer, and militia services; the chronology of military laws and executive decisions
before, during, and after the war; and the geographical breakdown of command structures. The book is illustrated with 84 new
diagrams of all the insignias used throughout the war and with 129 portraits of the most important high commanders. It is
the most comprehensive volume to date...name any Union or Confederate general--and it can be found in here. [T]he photos
alone are worth the purchase. RATED FIVE STARS by americancivilwarhistory.org
Records of the Union and Confederate Armies; Walter Clark, Histories of the Several Regiments and Battalions from North Carolina
in the Great War 1861-1865; National Park Service: American Civil War; National Park Service: Soldiers and Sailors System;
Weymouth T. Jordan and Louis H. Manarin, North Carolina Troops, 1861-1865; D. H. Hill, Confederate Military History Of North Carolina: North Carolina In The Civil War, 1861-1865; Vernon H. Crow,
Storm in the Mountains: Thomas' Confederate Legion of Cherokee Indians and Mountaineers; Vernon H. Crow, The Justness of Our
Cause; E. Stanly Godbolt, Jr. and Mattie U. Russell, Confederate Colonel and Cherokee Chief: The Life of William Holland Thomas;
The Civil War Diary of William W. Stringfield, Johnson City, TN: East Tennessee Historical Society Publications; and
John R. Finger, The Eastern Band of Cherokees; Library of Congress.