Charleston and Civil War














American Civil War Homepage





Civil War Charleston and the Citadels of the Sea 

In Defense of Charleston: The Coastal Defenses

Coastal Defenses
 
Inventions and innovations employed in the Charleston area during the Civil War (1861-1865) would usher onto the world stage a new era of warfare.
 
The Civil War defenses of Charleston consisted of a system of defensive perimeters around the port city of Charleston from 1861 to 1865. Three of the structures were permanent fortifications constructed in the early nineteenth century, but most of the structures were field works constructed by slaves between 1861 and 1865. There were seventy-two major defensive positions and structures protecting Charleston during the Civil War. Excluding Fort Sumter, Fort Moultrie, and Castle Pinckney, these batteries were all constructed of earth.

The field works defending Charleston varied in size from small one—gun batteries for field pieces to large positions covering several acres and mounting twenty or more heavy siege cannons. Although the more complex batteries included such details as powder magazines, bombproofs, covered ways, and sunken batteries, virtually every work followed the basic plans of the post-Napoleonic period and utilized common profile elements. These plans included a ditch which acted as an obstacle to attackers, a parapet which used the earth from the ditch for protective relief, a terreplein or gun platform, and an embrasure in the parapet for cannons to fire. More specialized profile elements occurred in many heavy batteries, and all were derived from the European practices of military engineering.
 
Charleston‘s defensive works followed the practice taught at West Point, which included natural obstacles such as impassable marshes, river bends, and the mouths of estuaries carefully utilized to place the attacking party at a disadvantage and to protect isolated positions. Batteries were also skillfully situated in combination to provide crossing fields of fire, particularly in defense against naval attack. Fort Sumter, named in honor of General Thomas Sumter, Revolutionary War hero, was built following the War of 1812, as one of a series of fortifications on the Southern U.S. coast. Fort Sumter, the last bastion of resistance, was finally abandoned after the evacuation of Charleston in February 1865.

Civil War Charleston
Charleston and the Coastal Defenses.jpg
Charleston and the Coastal Defenses

































Civil War Battlefields of South Carolina
Map of South Carolina Civil War Battles.gif
Map of South Carolina Civil War Battles




























Defending Charleston

General Robert E. Lee was appointed to the command of the South Carolina coastal defenses in November 1861. Lee‘s responsibility from then until March 1862 resulted in the adoption of an overall plan that stressed the use of earthworks and fortified defensive positions out of the range of heavy naval batteries.

General J. C. Pemberton assumed command of the Charleston defenses from March 1862 to August 1862. Pemberton abandoned the Cole's Island fortifications at the mouth of the Stono River, which opened James Island and Morris Island to amphibious assault by the Federal forces. In June 1862 a Federal force landed on James Island and advanced against the earthworks which General Pemberton was erecting. An assault on Fort Lamar at Secessionville on June 16 was repulsed.

Battle of Secessionville Map
Battle of Secessionville Map.jpg
Battle of Secessionville

General Beauregard was recalled to Charleston in August 1862, and he immediately strengthened and redefined the defensive perimeter. Beauregard's defenses included, in addition to the harbor and field fortifications, torpedoes, mines, harbor obstructions, and inonclad gunboats. On January 30, 1863, two Confederate gunboats, the Chicora and the Palmetto State, temporarily drove off the blockading fleet.
 
In January 1863 a large Federal fleet under the command of Du Pont, including the ironclad warship New Ironsides and four ironclad Monitor-class warships, was ordered to assault Charleston. This fleet made its assault on April 7, bombarding the harbor defenses and attempting to establish a land assault. Fort Sumter and Fort Moultrie bore the brunt of this attack. The attack was repulsed, with heavy damage to the invading fleet. In July 1863 a new assault under the command of Brigadier General Q. A. Gillmore and Admiral Dahlgren was launched. This assault sought to capture Fort Wagner on Morris Island.
 
After the July 11 assault on Fort Wagner failed, Gillmore reinforced his beachhead on Morris Island. At dusk July 18, Gillmore launched an attack spearheaded by the 54th Massachusetts Infantry, an all black volunteer regiment led by white officers. The unit’s colonel, Robert Gould Shaw, was killed. Members of the Union brigade scaled the parapet but after brutal hand-to-hand combat were repulsed with heavy casualties. The Federals resorted to siege operations to reduce the fort. This was the fourth time in the war that black troops played a crucial combat role, proving to skeptics that they would fight bravely if only given the opportunity.

Assault on Battery Wagner
Assault on Battery Wagner.jpg
Assault on Fort Wagner, aka Battery Wagner

Diversionary attacks on James Island and a continuous naval bombardment against Fort Wagner and the harbor defenses were included. After a fifty-eight day assault, Fort Wagner was evacuated on September 7. Morris Island served as a base for the continuing Federal siege on Charleston, including its use of the legendary Swamp Angel. Federal batteries on Morris Island began bombarding the harbor forts and the city proper. On September 8 an amphibious assault on Fort Sumter was repulsed. The land and naval bombardment of the defensive positions continued through the year. The Confederate defenders utilized numerous tactics to stymie the assault, including torpedoes, rams and the submarine Hunley, which on February 17, 1864, sank the Federal sloop Housatonic. In June 1864 a new amphibious assault on the James Island defensive line was repulsed. An amphibious assault on Fort Johnson on July 2—3 was also repulsed. At the same time, a concentrated naval assault on the James Island defenses, especially Fort Pringle, was begun; this assault lasted eight days before it was terminated. The land and naval bombardment of the defenses and the city itself were intensified through the year. On December 21, 1864, Savannah was evacuated in the face of General William T. Sherman's advancing troops. The Federal forces besieging Charleston intensified their assaults. The advance of General Sherman demanded that Charleston be evacuated, and on February 17, 1865, the Confederate defenders left the city.

Fort Sumter, South Carolina
Fort Sumter, South Carolina.jpg
View of Fort Sumter ruins in 1865 from a sandbar

Conclusion
 
Both the Confederate and the Federal governments realized the strategic importance of the port of Charleston. General Beauregard organized the defense of the city to repel attack from five different routes: land attack through Christ Church Parish north of Charleston; land attack from the south through St. Andrew's Parish to capture the city from the rear; combined land and naval attack through James Island; combined land and naval attack through Sullivan's Island and the harbor; combined land and naval attack through Morris Island.

The defensive perimeter established by Beauregard followed the plans of General Lee to place the inland defenses out of range of the heavy naval batteries. The abandonment of Cole's Island by General Pemberton opened the Stone River to the Federal gunboats, and allowed for an amphibious attack on James Island and Morris Island. Beauregard recognized James Island as the key to the siege and emphasized the defenses on the island accordingly. The Federal assault on the city lasted from l863 to l865, involving nearly continuous naval bombardment. Beauregard‘s defenses were able to resist the Federal attack until the advance of General Sherman demanded the abandonment of the city.

Charleston, South Carolina, ushered onto the world stage a new ere of warfare.

Coastal masonry fortifications were no longer citadels of peace, because rifled-artillery made them obsolete structures that had been born out of paranoia and excess. Primitive earthworks proved to be bastions of resilience, until the siege and mortar guns worked in concert to subdue them. Inventions and innovations employed in the Charleston area during the Civil War had ushered onto the world stage a new era of warfare.

From 1861 to 1865, the nations had witnessed in the Charleston area the employment of the multi-personnel submarine as well as ironclads in combat, technological improvements in mines and torpedoes, heavily constructed platforms in marshes and swamps supporting 8-ton artillery guns as they engaged in siege warfare, siege trains commandeering behemoth artillery pieces with ease, and determined, yet hastily constructed mosquito fleets unleash havoc on a naval power.

See also
 

Sources: Library of Congress, National Archives, National Park Service, Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies, Civil War Trust online civilwartrust.org; Burton, E. Milby. The Siege of Charleston, 1861-1865. Columbia, University of South Carolina Press, 1972; Coulter, E. Merton. The Confederate States of America, 1861-1865. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press, 1950; Freeman, Douglas Southall. R.E. Lee, A Biography. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1934; Gillmore, Q.A. Engineer and Artillery Operations Against the Defenses of Charleston Harbor in 1863. New York: D. Van Nostrand, 1865; Supplementary Report to Engineer and Artillery Operations Against the Defenses of Charleston Harbor in 1863. New York: D. Van Nostrand, 1868; Hagood, Johnson. Memoirs of the War of Secession. Columbia, S.C.: The State Co. 1910; Johnson, John. The Defense of Charleston Harbor. Charleston, S.C.: Walker, Evans and Cogswell Co. 1890; Jones, Samuel. The Siege of Charleston. New York: Neale Publishing Co., 1911; Mahan, D.H. A Treatise on Field Fortification. New York: John Wiley, 1860; Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies in the War of the Rebellion, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1882; Official Records of the Union and Confederate Navies in the War of the Rebellion. Series 1, Vol. 16. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1903; Ripley, R.J. “Charleston and Its Defenses" in Year Book - 1885, City of Charleston. 1885; Ripley, Warren. Artillery and Ammunition of the Civil War. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. 1975; Roman, Alfred. The Military Operations of General Beauregard. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1884; Simons, Grange. "List of Fortifications of James Island and for Whom Named." Charleston, S.C. Washington Light Infantry Collection, Charleston; Whitelaw, Robert N. S. and Alice F. Levkoff. Charleston Come Hell or High Water; Columbia, S.C.: R.L. Bryan Co., 1975.

Introduction

Return to American Civil War Homepage

Return to top